Elections And Political Parties
Wilson vs. Layne
Question/Issue: Do law enforcement officers violate the Forth Amendment by inviting members of the media to be present during warrant executions? If so, can officers be successfully sued for allowing the media at attend the warrant’s execution?
Basic Conflict: On the morning of April 16, 1992, Charles and Geraldine Wilson were lying awake in bed in their suburban house of Washington, D.C. A loud banging was heard on the front door. When Charles opened went down to the living room, he came across a half dozen U.S. Marshals and Montgomery County, Maryland sheriff’s deputies with their weapons drawn. Washington Post reporter Paul Valentine and his photographer were also on the scene, recording each detail inside the house, accompanied with police.
Officers said they were searching for the Wilson’s middle aged son, Dominic, who didn’t live with his parents. Yet upon seeing Charles in his underwear, sheriff’s deputies ordered him to lie down on the floor. Though he looked nothing like his son, (the suspect, Dominic, was clean shaven, while Charles wore a gray beard) U.S. marshals began “questioning” Charles, cursing and threatening to arrest him if Dominic was found in the house. It turned out he wasn’t in the house.
Valentine’s job was to obtain background for a story about a joint federal and local law enforcement task force called Operation Gunsmoke. The operation targeted prison escapes, bail jumpers, and individuals violating probation or parole. Dominic, who was suspected of violating probation, wasn’t captured in the raid. The Washington Post photographer shot Charles was lying on his living room floor, restrained by police. His wife Geraldine came into the room wearing a nightgown, pleading police to free her husband, and also photographed. Eventually, the Post decided to not publish the pictures. The parents found Dominic and told him to surrender to authorities. After he agreed, the...
View Full Essay