Employee Discrimination
Labor Discrimination has always been an apparent problem in the workplace, but in today's society the real question is whether or not it still exists in the work field. The three articles discuss different techniques of how to measure labor discrimination. The main focus is how apparent discrimination is and if the measurement techniques accurately show this figure. The writers of the papers all agreed that discrimination does exist in the workplace, but some argued that the level of discrimination varies. The discrimination level, in respect to what I see, is not that serious of a problem as many people think. Although, the evidence from these three papers can be used to prove both sides of the discrimination argument.
In the article from Darity and Mason, they focus on statistics as evidence to prove that discrimination exists and is a serious problem to the workplace. The paper, "Evidence on Discrimination in Employment: Codes of Colors, Codes of Gender", is based on data collected over the years through audit studies and various other tests on employment opportunities.
Arrow questions the significance of statistical test and gives a background on the theory of racial discrimination. The argument of rational decision making is brought up in Arrow's paper, "What Has Economics to Say About Racial Discrimination?"
In the last article, Heckman proposes that economist interpret statistical evidence and questions its reliability of statistical evidence. In "Detecting Discrimination", audit studies are questioned for their credibility for measuring discrimination. Points are made about other factors that can cause discrimination in employment in the paper. Heckman questions whether these points can be considered discrimination as well.
Darity and Mason focused their paper on empirical data. They made an argument that race and gender were the reasons for discrimination in the workplace. Arrow and Heckman argued more...
View Full Essay