Evaluating Legislatures And Legislators

Evaluating Legislatures And Legislators

It is absolutely impossible for a legislature to operate perfectly, but to work well is feasible and in my eyes it is what legislatures are doing. Working well to me means that you are able to satisfy the majority of your constituents, majority of the time. So if 51% of your constituents agree with your decision 51% of the time, then I believe that you are working well. Because there are so many people that you must try to please on any certain issue, it is impossible to satisfy everyone, and even making the majority of the people happy is a very hard thing to do. As a legislature they must also work together to reach the goal previously explained. They must also make sure that their decisions affect the economy in a positive sense. A legislature must be able to create their own legislation when they feel that they are being just and fair to humanity. But ultimately they must do whatever it takes to make the majority of their constituents happy, even if that means going against some of the other parts of the standard I’ve mentioned. I think this standard of getting the majority of the constituents to agree with your decisions majority of the time is very appropriate. It is a very realistic, reachable standard that seems to be necessary if you want run a successful legislature. Reaching this standard is not far-fetched and is a fair way to judge a legislature’s performance.
Vermont’s legislature works very well in regards to the standard described above. Therefore, I would say that the Vermont legislature works well. When the gay rights bill was brought up, Wright was unsure on exactly how his constituents felt about the issue. Because of this uncertainty he was unable to determine how he should go about representing his constituents. When the bill was first brought up he sent it to the judiciary committee, and then decided to have the committee wait to pass the bill on in order to allow the supporters of the bill and the non-supporters of the bill to...
  • Submitted by:
  • Date Submitted: 10/06/2008 01:27 PM
  • Category: Social Issues
  • Words: 1731
  • Pages: 7
  • Views: 33
  • Rank: 4410

Related Essays

  • Views On Congress The complicated inner workings of the United States government emerged from the idea of a separation of powers. Referred to as checks and balances, this system in...
  • Bureaucracy Case Analysis Introduction The following case, Wichita Confronts Contamination, involves a vast polluted underground lake containing hazardous industrial waste. The site is loc...
  • Electoral College And Fillibuster The United States simply does not balance the majority with the minority; it is an infatuation that such can be balanced within the various implementations of ant...
  • Globalisation Education Women Globalisation is a series of social, economical, technological, cultural, and political changes that promote interdependence and growth. Globalisation raises the ...
  • Why The Public Company Accounting Board Was Created (Pcaob) Why the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board Was Created (PCAOB) Table of Contents Introduction 3 I. Boards in Operation before the Public Accounting 4 Overs...

Saved Essays

Save essays to help find them more easily!

Join Now

Instant access to thousands of essays.

Join Now